4. Be a little gay and a little more interesting for him. His boring day may need a lift and one of your duties is to provide it.
5. Clear away the clutter. Make one last trip through the main part of the house just before your husband arrives. Gather up schoolbooks, toys, paper, etc. and then run a dust cloth over the tables.
6. Over the cooler months of the year, you should prepare and light a fire for him to unwind by. Your husband will feel he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give you a lift too. After all, catering for his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.
So far, do you do these things? Check out the NEXT and let us know…
ShariD says
This would be irritating at best, suggesting women should all be meek little second class nobodies to do and be nothing more than household drudges, only good for doing her master’s bidding 24-7, and never having an individuality of her own, or granted the privilege of speaking up for herself when taken so ridiculously for granted, as this nonsense states.
IF it were real, but it’s a fraud. The article to which this all referred did not exist. The magazine, titled “Housekeeping Monthly” did not exist either. It’s never been found in any register of published magazines in this country, or any other. The image purported to be published at the beginning of the original article, from which this has all been taken, has at the top right corner a reference to “The Advertising Archives” which suggests a fraud, since the Archives itself was not started until 1990. Even the presence of that image is a dead giveaway since it first was published as original cover art on a magazine from Great Britain, called “John Bull” but not until January, 1957. The original article, from which all this stems, claims a publication date of May, 1955. Can’t be, if it was actually published for the first time in 1957.
Many sources have investigated it all thoroughly, and have just as thoroughly debunked the whole thing.
Google it – simple as that – and you’ll find plenty to verify what I’ve said. Even the Wikipedia article on the “John Bull” magazine shows this particular cover art to illustrate it!