Stories

Spielberg Says One Of The Worst Parts Of ‘Jaws’ Was A ‘Blessing In Disguise’

Steven Spielberg‘s American thriller movie, Jaws, adapted from Peter Benchley’s novel of the same name, captivated viewers and reshaped the very essence of filmmaking itself. The movie is often hailed for its pivotal role in birthing the modern blockbuster era, and upon its release in 1975, it became the highest-grossing film of its time, but not without its fair share of challenges.

Recently, the movie director, Steven Spielberg, reflected on the production of Jaws. While reminiscing about the problems the crew encountered during filming, the 77-year-old is grateful for the invaluable career lessons that came with it.

What was the problem with ‘Jaws’?

JAWS, front, from left: Richard Dreyfuss, Roy Scheider, 1975

Throughout the filming, numerous challenges plagued the production set, resulting in the schedule extending beyond 100 days and the budget soaring from an initial $4 million to a staggering $9 million. Among the most significant hurdles was the consistent malfunctioning of the three mechanical sharks, affectionately dubbed Bruce.

RELATED: ‘Jaws’ Cast Then And Now 2024

The improvised sharks frequently encountered technical glitches during filming, causing delays and disruptions. While shooting a scene, one of the Bruce sharks suddenly nosedived to the ocean floor, adding to the logistical nightmares faced by the production crew.

JAWS, 1975

The mechanical sharks’ failure forced him to be innovative

During an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Spielberg revealed that the malfunctioning improvised Jaws shark unexpectedly became an opportunity for the entire production rather than a setback. He shared how this challenge spurred his creativity, leading him to adopt techniques similar to Alfred Hitchcock’s suspenseful filmmaking style.

JAWS, 1975

Instead of showcasing the shark directly, Spielberg opted for a more indirect approach, filming the attacks from above the water’s surface, keeping the creature hidden from view, intensifying the suspense, and making the audience’s imagination run wild. “The fact that the shark didn’t work on the set was an artistic blessing in disguise — it forced me to be Hitchcockian,” he confessed to Entertainment Weekly.

Show comments
Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Paul Anka On Why His Romance With Annette Funicello Ended

Paul Anka and Annette Funicello shared a close and meaningful relationship that began in the…

4 hours ago

John Oates Admits It Was A Miracle Hall And Oates Lasted So Long

John Oates and his musical partner Daryl Hall have been involved in an infamous legal…

16 hours ago

Gen Z Has Canceled Ankle Socks As “A Millennial Giveaway”

There are some topics that can get very binary answers: pineapple on pizza, summer or…

19 hours ago

Toby Keith Taught His Daughter To “Never Apologize For Being Patriotic”

Following the passing of country music legend Toby Keith, fans around the country raised their…

1 day ago

91-Year-Old Graduates From College 70 Years After Becoming Student

If there are two lessons to living a full and happy life, it's age is…

2 days ago

The Beach Boys Credit John Lennon And Paul McCartney For The Success Of Their 1966 Album

After making waves with up to ten studio albums in 1966, the Beach Boys got…

2 days ago