
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban have finalized their divorce, ending a 19-year marriage that captivated fans worldwide. While custody arrangements and asset division were key parts of the proceedings, the public quickly focused on a long-rumored detail: the so-called Keith Urban cocaine clause.
The couple’s split surprised many, but court filings revealed that legal issues had been settled well before the divorce became official. According to Tyla, “More details have emerged, including whether the so-called ‘cocaine clause’ could be real.” The mention of the clause immediately sparked questions about its authenticity and what it might have meant for both parties.
What the Keith Urban Cocaine Clause Allegedly Meant
The Keith cocaine clause reportedly stemmed from a rumored prenuptial agreement when the couple married in 2006. Reports suggested that if Urban remained sober throughout the marriage and the couple later divorced, he could receive an annual payout. Over 19 years, this amount might have totaled millions of dollars, generating curiosity and speculation among fans.

However, the official court filings tell a different story. The documents focus on shared custody of their daughters and a roughly equal division of assets. The Keith Urban cocaine clause does not appear in any formal paperwork, leaving its existence unverified. Many outlets now question whether it was ever more than a media rumor.
Why the Keith Urban Cocaine Clause Captured Attention

Interest in the Keith Urban cocaine clause reflects the public’s fascination with celebrity marriages and the private rules they may create. Urban has spoken openly about sobriety, while Kidman often emphasized honesty and support in their relationship. That combination made the alleged clause seem plausible to many observers.

Despite all the speculation, the divorce itself proceeded smoothly. Both waived spousal and child support, and the couple agreed on custody arrangements for their two daughters in Nashville. While the Keith cocaine clause captured headlines, it played no role in the official filings. Instead, the documents highlight the couple’s focus on fairness and stability for their family.
